Head-to-Head Analysis

Russian Style Borscht vs Great Value Organic No Salt Added While Kernel Corn, 15 Oz

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Russian Style Borscht

Russian Style Borscht

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Great Value Organic No Salt Added While Kernel Corn, 15 Oz

Great Value Organic No Salt Added While Kernel Corn, 15 Oz

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
33.5 kcal
Energy
60 kcal
5.2g
Sugars
2g
0g
Fat
0.5g
0.4g
Protein
1g
0.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Russian Style Borscht and Great Value Organic No Salt Added While Kernel Corn, 15 Oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Russian Style Borscht is the clear winner. With 27 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Russian Style Borscht contains significantly more sugar (5.2044609665428g) compared to the milder Great Value Organic No Salt Added While Kernel Corn, 15 Oz (2g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Great Value Organic No Salt Added While Kernel Corn, 15 Oz is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Russian Style Borscht or Great Value Organic No Salt Added While Kernel Corn, 15 Oz?

It depends on your goals. Russian Style Borscht has 33.457249070632 calories, while Great Value Organic No Salt Added While Kernel Corn, 15 Oz has 60 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Russian Style Borscht vegan?

No, Russian Style Borscht is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Russian Style Borscht and Great Value Organic No Salt Added While Kernel Corn, 15 Oz?

There is a difference of 27 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.