Head-to-Head Analysis

Rustic Chicken vs Gluten Free Chocolate Thins

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Rustic Chicken

Rustic Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Gluten Free Chocolate Thins

Gluten Free Chocolate Thins

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
95.7 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
0.8g
Sugars
41.2g
3g
Fat
23.5g
8.3g
Protein
5.9g
0.6g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Rustic Chicken and Gluten Free Chocolate Thins side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Rustic Chicken is the clear winner. With 404 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Rustic Chicken takes the lead with only 0.756g of sugar per 100g, whereas Gluten Free Chocolate Thins contains 41.18g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Rustic Chicken offers a protein boost with 8.31g per 100g, outperforming Gluten Free Chocolate Thins in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Rustic Chicken or Gluten Free Chocolate Thins?

Rustic Chicken appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Rustic Chicken vegan?

No, Rustic Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Rustic Chicken and Gluten Free Chocolate Thins?

There is a difference of 404 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.