S’mores Bark vs Lifesavers
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
S’mores Bark
Lifesavers
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing S’mores Bark and Lifesavers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
S’mores Bark is the more energy-dense option here, packing 410 more calories per 100g than Lifesavers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. S’mores Bark contains significantly more sugar (60g) compared to the milder Lifesavers (18g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Lifesavers is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? S’mores Bark offers a protein boost with 3.33g per 100g, outperforming Lifesavers in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: S’mores Bark or Lifesavers?
It depends on your goals. S’mores Bark has 500 calories, while Lifesavers has 89.9 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is S’mores Bark vegan?
No, S’mores Bark is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between S’mores Bark and Lifesavers?
There is a difference of 410 calories per 100g between the two products.
