Safari Track vs Indiana, Kettlecorn, Sweet & Salty
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Safari Track
Indiana, Kettlecorn, Sweet & Salty
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Safari Track and Indiana, Kettlecorn, Sweet & Salty side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Safari Track is the clear winner. With 173 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Safari Track or Indiana, Kettlecorn, Sweet & Salty?
It depends on your goals. Safari Track has 291 calories, while Indiana, Kettlecorn, Sweet & Salty has 464 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Safari Track vegan?
No, Safari Track is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Safari Track and Indiana, Kettlecorn, Sweet & Salty?
There is a difference of 173 calories per 100g between the two products.
