Safari Track vs Original Seoul Kimchi
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Safari Track
Original Seoul Kimchi
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Safari Track and Original Seoul Kimchi side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Safari Track is the more energy-dense option here, packing 255 more calories per 100g than Original Seoul Kimchi. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Safari Track contains significantly more sugar (29.1g) compared to the milder Original Seoul Kimchi (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original Seoul Kimchi is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Safari Track offers a protein boost with 4.55g per 100g, outperforming Original Seoul Kimchi in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Safari Track or Original Seoul Kimchi?
It depends on your goals. Safari Track has 291 calories, while Original Seoul Kimchi has 35.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Safari Track vegan?
No, Safari Track is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Safari Track and Original Seoul Kimchi?
There is a difference of 255 calories per 100g between the two products.
