Head-to-Head Analysis

Sala vs The Original Corn Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sala

Sala

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of The Original Corn Chips

The Original Corn Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
53.6 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
10.7g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
35.7g
0g
Protein
7.1g
1.5g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sala and The Original Corn Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sala is the clear winner. With 517 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sala contains significantly more sugar (10.7g) compared to the milder The Original Corn Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, The Original Corn Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sala or The Original Corn Chips?

It depends on your goals. Sala has 53.6 calories, while The Original Corn Chips has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sala vegan?

No, Sala is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sala and The Original Corn Chips?

There is a difference of 517 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.