Head-to-Head Analysis

Salmon Teriyaki Bowl vs Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Salmon Teriyaki Bowl

Salmon Teriyaki Bowl

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes

Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
158 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
4.1g
Sugars
0g
3.9g
Fat
0g
4.8g
Protein
0g
0.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Salmon Teriyaki Bowl and Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Salmon Teriyaki Bowl is the more energy-dense option here, packing 158 more calories per 100g than Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Salmon Teriyaki Bowl contains significantly more sugar (4.11g) compared to the milder Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Salmon Teriyaki Bowl offers a protein boost with 4.79g per 100g, outperforming Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Salmon Teriyaki Bowl or Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes?

It depends on your goals. Salmon Teriyaki Bowl has 158 calories, while Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Salmon Teriyaki Bowl vegan?

No, Salmon Teriyaki Bowl is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Salmon Teriyaki Bowl and Plain, Powdered & Cinnamon Donut Holes?

There is a difference of 158 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.