Head-to-Head Analysis

Salsa diablohot vs WHITE COOKING WINE

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Salsa diablohot

Salsa diablohot

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of WHITE COOKING WINE

WHITE COOKING WINE

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
32.3 kcal
Energy
66.7 kcal
3.2g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
2.3g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Salsa diablohot and WHITE COOKING WINE side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Salsa diablohot is the clear winner. With 34 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Salsa diablohot contains significantly more sugar (3.23g) compared to the milder WHITE COOKING WINE (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, WHITE COOKING WINE is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Salsa diablohot or WHITE COOKING WINE?

It depends on your goals. Salsa diablohot has 32.26 calories, while WHITE COOKING WINE has 66.666666666667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Salsa diablohot vegan?

No, Salsa diablohot is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Salsa diablohot and WHITE COOKING WINE?

There is a difference of 34 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.