Head-to-Head Analysis

Salt And Vin Protein Chips vs Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Salt And Vin Protein Chips

Salt And Vin Protein Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces

Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
409 kcal
Energy
263 kcal
0g
Sugars
31.6g
13.6g
Fat
9.2g
45.5g
Protein
2.6g
3g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Salt And Vin Protein Chips and Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Salt And Vin Protein Chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 146 more calories per 100g than Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Salt And Vin Protein Chips takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces contains 31.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Salt And Vin Protein Chips offers a protein boost with 45.5g per 100g, outperforming Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Salt And Vin Protein Chips or Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces?

It depends on your goals. Salt And Vin Protein Chips has 409 calories, while Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces has 263 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Salt And Vin Protein Chips vegan?

No, Salt And Vin Protein Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Salt And Vin Protein Chips and Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces?

There is a difference of 146 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.