Salted 313 urban chips vs Chocolate de mesa sweet baking chocolate
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Salted 313 urban chips
Chocolate de mesa sweet baking chocolate
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Salted 313 urban chips and Chocolate de mesa sweet baking chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Salted 313 urban chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 38 more calories per 100g than Chocolate de mesa sweet baking chocolate. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Salted 313 urban chips takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chocolate de mesa sweet baking chocolate contains 69.23g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Salted 313 urban chips offers a protein boost with 7.1428571428571g per 100g, outperforming Chocolate de mesa sweet baking chocolate in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Salted 313 urban chips or Chocolate de mesa sweet baking chocolate?
It depends on your goals. Salted 313 urban chips has 500 calories, while Chocolate de mesa sweet baking chocolate has 461.54 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Salted 313 urban chips vegan?
No, Salted 313 urban chips is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Salted 313 urban chips and Chocolate de mesa sweet baking chocolate?
There is a difference of 38 calories per 100g between the two products.
