Head-to-Head Analysis

Salted Caramel Oikos Protein Shake vs Organic Sparkling Coconut Water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Salted Caramel Oikos Protein Shake

Salted Caramel Oikos Protein Shake

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Organic Sparkling Coconut Water

Organic Sparkling Coconut Water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
47.9 kcal
Energy
21.1 kcal
0.3g
Sugars
4.9g
1g
Fat
0g
8.5g
Protein
0g
0.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Salted Caramel Oikos Protein Shake and Organic Sparkling Coconut Water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Salted Caramel Oikos Protein Shake is the more energy-dense option here, packing 27 more calories per 100g than Organic Sparkling Coconut Water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Salted Caramel Oikos Protein Shake takes the lead with only 0.282g of sugar per 100g, whereas Organic Sparkling Coconut Water contains 4.86g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Salted Caramel Oikos Protein Shake offers a protein boost with 8.45g per 100g, outperforming Organic Sparkling Coconut Water in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Salted Caramel Oikos Protein Shake or Organic Sparkling Coconut Water?

It depends on your goals. Salted Caramel Oikos Protein Shake has 47.9 calories, while Organic Sparkling Coconut Water has 21.1 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Salted Caramel Oikos Protein Shake vegan?

No, Salted Caramel Oikos Protein Shake is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Salted Caramel Oikos Protein Shake and Organic Sparkling Coconut Water?

There is a difference of 27 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.