Head-to-Head Analysis

Salted Caramel Pink Himalayan Salt vs Licorice Soft Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Salted Caramel Pink Himalayan Salt

Salted Caramel Pink Himalayan Salt

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Licorice Soft Original

Licorice Soft Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
333.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
50g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
3.3g
1.2g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Salted Caramel Pink Himalayan Salt and Licorice Soft Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Salted Caramel Pink Himalayan Salt is the clear winner. With 333 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Salted Caramel Pink Himalayan Salt takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Licorice Soft Original contains 50g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Salted Caramel Pink Himalayan Salt or Licorice Soft Original?

Salted Caramel Pink Himalayan Salt appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Salted Caramel Pink Himalayan Salt vegan?

No, Salted Caramel Pink Himalayan Salt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Salted Caramel Pink Himalayan Salt and Licorice Soft Original?

There is a difference of 333 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.