Head-to-Head Analysis

Salted Cashews vs Thanksgiving Stuffing Seasoned Kettle Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Salted Cashews

Salted Cashews

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Thanksgiving Stuffing Seasoned Kettle Chips

Thanksgiving Stuffing Seasoned Kettle Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
571 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
3.6g
45.2g
Fat
21.4g
19g
Protein
7.1g
0.9g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Salted Cashews and Thanksgiving Stuffing Seasoned Kettle Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Salted Cashews is the more energy-dense option here, packing 71 more calories per 100g than Thanksgiving Stuffing Seasoned Kettle Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Salted Cashews contains significantly more sugar (7.14g) compared to the milder Thanksgiving Stuffing Seasoned Kettle Chips (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Thanksgiving Stuffing Seasoned Kettle Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Salted Cashews offers a protein boost with 19g per 100g, outperforming Thanksgiving Stuffing Seasoned Kettle Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Salted Cashews or Thanksgiving Stuffing Seasoned Kettle Chips?

It depends on your goals. Salted Cashews has 571 calories, while Thanksgiving Stuffing Seasoned Kettle Chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Salted Cashews vegan?

No, Salted Cashews is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Salted Cashews and Thanksgiving Stuffing Seasoned Kettle Chips?

There is a difference of 71 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.