Head-to-Head Analysis

Salted Roasted Deluxe Whole Cashews vs Dried Mediterranean Apricots

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Salted Roasted Deluxe Whole Cashews

Salted Roasted Deluxe Whole Cashews

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Dried Mediterranean Apricots

Dried Mediterranean Apricots

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
571 kcal
Energy
250 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
40g
46.4g
Fat
0g
17.9g
Protein
2.5g
0.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Salted Roasted Deluxe Whole Cashews and Dried Mediterranean Apricots side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Salted Roasted Deluxe Whole Cashews is the more energy-dense option here, packing 321 more calories per 100g than Dried Mediterranean Apricots. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Salted Roasted Deluxe Whole Cashews takes the lead with only 3.57g of sugar per 100g, whereas Dried Mediterranean Apricots contains 40g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Salted Roasted Deluxe Whole Cashews offers a protein boost with 17.9g per 100g, outperforming Dried Mediterranean Apricots in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Salted Roasted Deluxe Whole Cashews or Dried Mediterranean Apricots?

It depends on your goals. Salted Roasted Deluxe Whole Cashews has 571 calories, while Dried Mediterranean Apricots has 250 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Salted Roasted Deluxe Whole Cashews vegan?

No, Salted Roasted Deluxe Whole Cashews is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Salted Roasted Deluxe Whole Cashews and Dried Mediterranean Apricots?

There is a difference of 321 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.