San Francisco Cookies vs Coconut macaroons, coconut
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
San Francisco Cookies
Coconut macaroons, coconut
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing San Francisco Cookies and Coconut macaroons, coconut side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
San Francisco Cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 94 more calories per 100g than Coconut macaroons, coconut. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, San Francisco Cookies takes the lead with only 28.6g of sugar per 100g, whereas Coconut macaroons, coconut contains 40.62g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? San Francisco Cookies offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Coconut macaroons, coconut in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: San Francisco Cookies or Coconut macaroons, coconut?
It depends on your goals. San Francisco Cookies has 500 calories, while Coconut macaroons, coconut has 406 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is San Francisco Cookies vegan?
No, San Francisco Cookies is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between San Francisco Cookies and Coconut macaroons, coconut?
There is a difference of 94 calories per 100g between the two products.
