Head-to-Head Analysis

SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS vs Potato Chips Backyard Barbeque

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS

SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Potato Chips Backyard Barbeque

Potato Chips Backyard Barbeque

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
220 kcal
Energy
494 kcal
2.2g
Sugars
3.5g
1.7g
Fat
28.2g
7.7g
Protein
7.1g
1.4g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS and Potato Chips Backyard Barbeque side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS is the clear winner. With 274 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS takes the lead with only 2.2g of sugar per 100g, whereas Potato Chips Backyard Barbeque contains 3.53g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS or Potato Chips Backyard Barbeque?

SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS vegan?

No, SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS and Potato Chips Backyard Barbeque?

There is a difference of 274 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.