SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS vs Sesame sticks
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS
Sesame sticks
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS and Sesame sticks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS is the clear winner. With 340 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS contains significantly more sugar (2.2g) compared to the milder Sesame sticks (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sesame sticks is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS or Sesame sticks?
It depends on your goals. SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS has 220 calories, while Sesame sticks has 560 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS vegan?
No, SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH SUPER-THICK ENGLISH MUFFINS and Sesame sticks?
There is a difference of 340 calories per 100g between the two products.
