Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna vs Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna
Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna and Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna is the clear winner. With 52 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna contains significantly more sugar (4.23g) compared to the milder Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna or Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans?
It depends on your goals. Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna has 85 calories, while Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans has 137 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna vegan?
No, Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna and Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans?
There is a difference of 52 calories per 100g between the two products.
