Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna vs Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna
Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna and Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna is the clear winner. With 215 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna contains significantly more sugar (4.23g) compared to the milder Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna or Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil?
It depends on your goals. Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna has 85 calories, while Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna vegan?
No, Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sandwich in seconds tuna salad, tuna and Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil?
There is a difference of 215 calories per 100g between the two products.
