Head-to-Head Analysis

Sanpellegrino vs Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sanpellegrino

Sanpellegrino

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond

Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
36.4 kcal
Energy
325 kcal
8.8g
Sugars
65g
0g
Fat
5g
0g
Protein
2.5g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sanpellegrino and Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sanpellegrino is the clear winner. With 289 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Sanpellegrino takes the lead with only 8.7878787878788g of sugar per 100g, whereas Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond contains 65g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sanpellegrino or Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond?

Sanpellegrino appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Sanpellegrino vegan?

No, Sanpellegrino is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sanpellegrino and Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond?

There is a difference of 289 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.