Head-to-Head Analysis

Santa Monica Fruity Gummy Bears vs Wild Rice Lightly Salted Whole Grain Rice Cakes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Santa Monica Fruity Gummy Bears

Santa Monica Fruity Gummy Bears

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wild Rice Lightly Salted Whole Grain Rice Cakes

Wild Rice Lightly Salted Whole Grain Rice Cakes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
321 kcal
Energy
378 kcal
64.3g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
2.7g
0g
Protein
5.4g
0.7g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Santa Monica Fruity Gummy Bears and Wild Rice Lightly Salted Whole Grain Rice Cakes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Santa Monica Fruity Gummy Bears is the clear winner. With 57 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Santa Monica Fruity Gummy Bears contains significantly more sugar (64.3g) compared to the milder Wild Rice Lightly Salted Whole Grain Rice Cakes (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wild Rice Lightly Salted Whole Grain Rice Cakes is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Santa Monica Fruity Gummy Bears or Wild Rice Lightly Salted Whole Grain Rice Cakes?

It depends on your goals. Santa Monica Fruity Gummy Bears has 321 calories, while Wild Rice Lightly Salted Whole Grain Rice Cakes has 378 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Santa Monica Fruity Gummy Bears vegan?

No, Santa Monica Fruity Gummy Bears is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Santa Monica Fruity Gummy Bears and Wild Rice Lightly Salted Whole Grain Rice Cakes?

There is a difference of 57 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.