Head-to-Head Analysis

Sardines de Bretagne vs Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Spicy Thai Chili

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sardines de Bretagne

Sardines de Bretagne

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Spicy Thai Chili

Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Spicy Thai Chili

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
204 kcal
Energy
127 kcal
0g
Sugars
5.6g
12g
Fat
1.4g
24g
Protein
21.1g
0.9g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sardines de Bretagne and Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Spicy Thai Chili side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sardines de Bretagne is the more energy-dense option here, packing 77 more calories per 100g than Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Spicy Thai Chili. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Sardines de Bretagne takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Spicy Thai Chili contains 5.63g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Sardines de Bretagne offers a protein boost with 24g per 100g, outperforming Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Spicy Thai Chili in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sardines de Bretagne or Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Spicy Thai Chili?

It depends on your goals. Sardines de Bretagne has 204 calories, while Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Spicy Thai Chili has 127 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sardines de Bretagne vegan?

No, Sardines de Bretagne is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sardines de Bretagne and Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Spicy Thai Chili?

There is a difference of 77 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.