Head-to-Head Analysis

Sardines in Tomato Sauce vs Soft Baked, Fruit & Oat Breakfast Ovals: Chocolate Chip Banana

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sardines in Tomato Sauce

Sardines in Tomato Sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Soft Baked, Fruit & Oat Breakfast Ovals: Chocolate Chip Banana

Soft Baked, Fruit & Oat Breakfast Ovals: Chocolate Chip Banana

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
129 kcal
Energy
460 kcal
0g
Sugars
24g
7.1g
Fat
22g
16.5g
Protein
6g
0.5g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sardines in Tomato Sauce and Soft Baked, Fruit & Oat Breakfast Ovals: Chocolate Chip Banana side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sardines in Tomato Sauce is the clear winner. With 331 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Sardines in Tomato Sauce takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Soft Baked, Fruit & Oat Breakfast Ovals: Chocolate Chip Banana contains 24g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Sardines in Tomato Sauce offers a protein boost with 16.5g per 100g, outperforming Soft Baked, Fruit & Oat Breakfast Ovals: Chocolate Chip Banana in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sardines in Tomato Sauce or Soft Baked, Fruit & Oat Breakfast Ovals: Chocolate Chip Banana?

Sardines in Tomato Sauce appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Sardines in Tomato Sauce vegan?

No, Sardines in Tomato Sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sardines in Tomato Sauce and Soft Baked, Fruit & Oat Breakfast Ovals: Chocolate Chip Banana?

There is a difference of 331 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.