Head-to-Head Analysis

Sardines In Tomato Sauce With Chili vs Maple & Cured Bacon Baked Beans

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sardines In Tomato Sauce With Chili

Sardines In Tomato Sauce With Chili

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Maple & Cured Bacon Baked Beans

Maple & Cured Bacon Baked Beans

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
140 kcal
Energy
108 kcal
0g
Sugars
5.9g
8g
Fat
0.8g
17g
Protein
5.4g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sardines In Tomato Sauce With Chili and Maple & Cured Bacon Baked Beans side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sardines In Tomato Sauce With Chili is the more energy-dense option here, packing 32 more calories per 100g than Maple & Cured Bacon Baked Beans. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Sardines In Tomato Sauce With Chili takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Maple & Cured Bacon Baked Beans contains 5.92g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Sardines In Tomato Sauce With Chili offers a protein boost with 17g per 100g, outperforming Maple & Cured Bacon Baked Beans in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sardines In Tomato Sauce With Chili or Maple & Cured Bacon Baked Beans?

It depends on your goals. Sardines In Tomato Sauce With Chili has 140 calories, while Maple & Cured Bacon Baked Beans has 108 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sardines In Tomato Sauce With Chili vegan?

No, Sardines In Tomato Sauce With Chili is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sardines In Tomato Sauce With Chili and Maple & Cured Bacon Baked Beans?

There is a difference of 32 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.