Head-to-Head Analysis

Scottish Salmon Steak vs Canned mackerel

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Scottish Salmon Steak

Scottish Salmon Steak

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Canned mackerel

Canned mackerel

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
140 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
8g
0g
Protein
17g
0g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Scottish Salmon Steak and Canned mackerel side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Scottish Salmon Steak is the clear winner. With 140 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Scottish Salmon Steak or Canned mackerel?

It depends on your goals. Scottish Salmon Steak has 0 calories, while Canned mackerel has 140 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Scottish Salmon Steak vegan?

No, Scottish Salmon Steak is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Scottish Salmon Steak and Canned mackerel?

There is a difference of 140 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.