Head-to-Head Analysis

Scottish style Smoke salmon vs Kettle Popped-Corn Snacks Sweet & Salty

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Scottish style Smoke salmon

Scottish style Smoke salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Kettle Popped-Corn Snacks Sweet & Salty

Kettle Popped-Corn Snacks Sweet & Salty

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
228 kcal
Energy
130 kcal
0g
Sugars
3g
15.8g
Fat
4g
22.8g
Protein
2g
2.7g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Scottish style Smoke salmon and Kettle Popped-Corn Snacks Sweet & Salty side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Scottish style Smoke salmon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 98 more calories per 100g than Kettle Popped-Corn Snacks Sweet & Salty. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Scottish style Smoke salmon takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Kettle Popped-Corn Snacks Sweet & Salty contains 3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Scottish style Smoke salmon offers a protein boost with 22.8g per 100g, outperforming Kettle Popped-Corn Snacks Sweet & Salty in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Scottish style Smoke salmon or Kettle Popped-Corn Snacks Sweet & Salty?

It depends on your goals. Scottish style Smoke salmon has 228 calories, while Kettle Popped-Corn Snacks Sweet & Salty has 130 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Scottish style Smoke salmon vegan?

No, Scottish style Smoke salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Scottish style Smoke salmon and Kettle Popped-Corn Snacks Sweet & Salty?

There is a difference of 98 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.