Head-to-Head Analysis

Sea Salt Almond Dark Chocolate vs Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sea Salt Almond Dark Chocolate

Sea Salt Almond Dark Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt

Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
520 kcal
Energy
412 kcal
40g
Sugars
0g
32g
Fat
20.6g
8g
Protein
0g
0.4g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sea Salt Almond Dark Chocolate and Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sea Salt Almond Dark Chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 108 more calories per 100g than Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sea Salt Almond Dark Chocolate contains significantly more sugar (40g) compared to the milder Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sea Salt Almond Dark Chocolate offers a protein boost with 8g per 100g, outperforming Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sea Salt Almond Dark Chocolate or Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt?

It depends on your goals. Sea Salt Almond Dark Chocolate has 520 calories, while Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt has 412 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sea Salt Almond Dark Chocolate vegan?

No, Sea Salt Almond Dark Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sea Salt Almond Dark Chocolate and Scalloped Crackers Sea Salt?

There is a difference of 108 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.