Head-to-Head Analysis

Sea Salt Cassava & Chickpea Crackers vs Coconut Ring Cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sea Salt Cassava & Chickpea Crackers

Sea Salt Cassava & Chickpea Crackers

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Coconut Ring Cookies

Coconut Ring Cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
433 kcal
Energy
455 kcal
0g
Sugars
30.3g
23.3g
Fat
13.6g
10g
Protein
9.1g
1.5g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sea Salt Cassava & Chickpea Crackers and Coconut Ring Cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sea Salt Cassava & Chickpea Crackers is the clear winner. With 22 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Sea Salt Cassava & Chickpea Crackers takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Coconut Ring Cookies contains 30.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sea Salt Cassava & Chickpea Crackers or Coconut Ring Cookies?

Sea Salt Cassava & Chickpea Crackers appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Sea Salt Cassava & Chickpea Crackers vegan?

No, Sea Salt Cassava & Chickpea Crackers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sea Salt Cassava & Chickpea Crackers and Coconut Ring Cookies?

There is a difference of 22 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.