Head-to-Head Analysis

Sea Salt Dark Chocolate 72% Cacao vs Fruit by the Foot Berry Tie-Dye

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sea Salt Dark Chocolate 72% Cacao

Sea Salt Dark Chocolate 72% Cacao

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Fruit by the Foot Berry Tie-Dye

Fruit by the Foot Berry Tie-Dye

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
588 kcal
Energy
381 kcal
29.4g
Sugars
47.6g
44.1g
Fat
4.8g
8.8g
Protein
0g
0.3g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sea Salt Dark Chocolate 72% Cacao and Fruit by the Foot Berry Tie-Dye side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sea Salt Dark Chocolate 72% Cacao is the more energy-dense option here, packing 207 more calories per 100g than Fruit by the Foot Berry Tie-Dye. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Sea Salt Dark Chocolate 72% Cacao takes the lead with only 29.4g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fruit by the Foot Berry Tie-Dye contains 47.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Sea Salt Dark Chocolate 72% Cacao offers a protein boost with 8.82g per 100g, outperforming Fruit by the Foot Berry Tie-Dye in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sea Salt Dark Chocolate 72% Cacao or Fruit by the Foot Berry Tie-Dye?

It depends on your goals. Sea Salt Dark Chocolate 72% Cacao has 588 calories, while Fruit by the Foot Berry Tie-Dye has 381 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sea Salt Dark Chocolate 72% Cacao vegan?

No, Sea Salt Dark Chocolate 72% Cacao is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sea Salt Dark Chocolate 72% Cacao and Fruit by the Foot Berry Tie-Dye?

There is a difference of 207 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.