Head-to-Head Analysis

Sea Salt Dry Roasted Pistachios vs Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sea Salt Dry Roasted Pistachios

Sea Salt Dry Roasted Pistachios

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel

Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
566.7 kcal
Energy
270 kcal
6.7g
Sugars
11g
46.7g
Fat
12g
20g
Protein
11g
1.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sea Salt Dry Roasted Pistachios and Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sea Salt Dry Roasted Pistachios is the more energy-dense option here, packing 297 more calories per 100g than Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Sea Salt Dry Roasted Pistachios takes the lead with only 6.6666666666667g of sugar per 100g, whereas Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel contains 11g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Sea Salt Dry Roasted Pistachios offers a protein boost with 20g per 100g, outperforming Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sea Salt Dry Roasted Pistachios or Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel?

It depends on your goals. Sea Salt Dry Roasted Pistachios has 566.66666666667 calories, while Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel has 270 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sea Salt Dry Roasted Pistachios vegan?

No, Sea Salt Dry Roasted Pistachios is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sea Salt Dry Roasted Pistachios and Organic Macrobar Cashew Caramel?

There is a difference of 297 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.