Head-to-Head Analysis

Sea salt roasted almonds vs Artichokes with Basil & Thyme

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sea salt roasted almonds

Sea salt roasted almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Artichokes with Basil & Thyme

Artichokes with Basil & Thyme

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
607.1 kcal
Energy
33.3 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
53.6g
Fat
0g
21.4g
Protein
0g
1g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sea salt roasted almonds and Artichokes with Basil & Thyme side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sea salt roasted almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 574 more calories per 100g than Artichokes with Basil & Thyme. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sea salt roasted almonds contains significantly more sugar (3.5714285714286g) compared to the milder Artichokes with Basil & Thyme (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Artichokes with Basil & Thyme is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sea salt roasted almonds offers a protein boost with 21.428571428571g per 100g, outperforming Artichokes with Basil & Thyme in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sea salt roasted almonds or Artichokes with Basil & Thyme?

It depends on your goals. Sea salt roasted almonds has 607.14285714286 calories, while Artichokes with Basil & Thyme has 33.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sea salt roasted almonds vegan?

No, Sea salt roasted almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sea salt roasted almonds and Artichokes with Basil & Thyme?

There is a difference of 574 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.