Head-to-Head Analysis

sea salt sesame sticks vs emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of sea salt sesame sticks

sea salt sesame sticks

Not Vegan
VS
Package of emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries

emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
550 kcal
Energy
170 kcal
0g
Sugars
22g
37.5g
Fat
8g
10g
Protein
1g
3.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing sea salt sesame sticks and emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

sea salt sesame sticks is the more energy-dense option here, packing 380 more calories per 100g than emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, sea salt sesame sticks takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries contains 22g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? sea salt sesame sticks offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: sea salt sesame sticks or emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries?

It depends on your goals. sea salt sesame sticks has 550 calories, while emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries has 170 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is sea salt sesame sticks vegan?

No, sea salt sesame sticks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between sea salt sesame sticks and emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries?

There is a difference of 380 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.