Head-to-Head Analysis

Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips vs CINNAMON SUGAR SEASONED PRETZEL TWISTS

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips

Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Package of CINNAMON SUGAR SEASONED PRETZEL TWISTS

CINNAMON SUGAR SEASONED PRETZEL TWISTS

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
464.3 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
0g
Sugars
21.4g
25g
Fat
17.9g
7.1g
Protein
7.1g
0.6g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips and CINNAMON SUGAR SEASONED PRETZEL TWISTS side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips is the clear winner. With 36 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas CINNAMON SUGAR SEASONED PRETZEL TWISTS contains 21.4g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips or CINNAMON SUGAR SEASONED PRETZEL TWISTS?

Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips vegan?

No, Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sea Salt Thin & Crispy Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips and CINNAMON SUGAR SEASONED PRETZEL TWISTS?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.