Seafood Snackers vs Lulas em tinta (squids in ink)
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Seafood Snackers
Lulas em tinta (squids in ink)
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Seafood Snackers and Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Seafood Snackers is the clear winner. With 31 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Seafood Snackers contains significantly more sugar (4.71g) compared to the milder Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) (0.7g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Seafood Snackers or Lulas em tinta (squids in ink)?
It depends on your goals. Seafood Snackers has 94.1 calories, while Lulas em tinta (squids in ink) has 125 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Seafood Snackers vegan?
No, Seafood Snackers is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Seafood Snackers and Lulas em tinta (squids in ink)?
There is a difference of 31 calories per 100g between the two products.
