Head-to-Head Analysis

Seared Salmon with Tuscan-Style Sauce vs Sea Salt Veggie Straws

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Seared Salmon with Tuscan-Style Sauce

Seared Salmon with Tuscan-Style Sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sea Salt Veggie Straws

Sea Salt Veggie Straws

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
155 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
1.4g
Sugars
0g
9.2g
Fat
21.4g
14.1g
Protein
3.6g
1.3g
Salt
11.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Seared Salmon with Tuscan-Style Sauce and Sea Salt Veggie Straws side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Seared Salmon with Tuscan-Style Sauce is the clear winner. With 309 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Seared Salmon with Tuscan-Style Sauce contains significantly more sugar (1.41g) compared to the milder Sea Salt Veggie Straws (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sea Salt Veggie Straws is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Seared Salmon with Tuscan-Style Sauce offers a protein boost with 14.1g per 100g, outperforming Sea Salt Veggie Straws in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Seared Salmon with Tuscan-Style Sauce or Sea Salt Veggie Straws?

It depends on your goals. Seared Salmon with Tuscan-Style Sauce has 155 calories, while Sea Salt Veggie Straws has 464 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Seared Salmon with Tuscan-Style Sauce vegan?

No, Seared Salmon with Tuscan-Style Sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Seared Salmon with Tuscan-Style Sauce and Sea Salt Veggie Straws?

There is a difference of 309 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.