Head-to-Head Analysis

Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese vs COLBY-PEPPER JACK SLICED COLBY-JACK CHEESE WITH JALAPEÑO & HABANERO PEPPERS

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese

Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese

Not Vegan
VS
Package of COLBY-PEPPER JACK SLICED COLBY-JACK CHEESE WITH JALAPEÑO & HABANERO PEPPERS

COLBY-PEPPER JACK SLICED COLBY-JACK CHEESE WITH JALAPEÑO & HABANERO PEPPERS

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333 kcal
Energy
368 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
28.6g
Fat
31.6g
23.8g
Protein
21.1g
1.2g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese and COLBY-PEPPER JACK SLICED COLBY-JACK CHEESE WITH JALAPEÑO & HABANERO PEPPERS side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese is the clear winner. With 35 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese offers a protein boost with 23.81g per 100g, outperforming COLBY-PEPPER JACK SLICED COLBY-JACK CHEESE WITH JALAPEÑO & HABANERO PEPPERS in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese or COLBY-PEPPER JACK SLICED COLBY-JACK CHEESE WITH JALAPEÑO & HABANERO PEPPERS?

It depends on your goals. Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese has 333 calories, while COLBY-PEPPER JACK SLICED COLBY-JACK CHEESE WITH JALAPEÑO & HABANERO PEPPERS has 368 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese vegan?

No, Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese and COLBY-PEPPER JACK SLICED COLBY-JACK CHEESE WITH JALAPEÑO & HABANERO PEPPERS?

There is a difference of 35 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.