Head-to-Head Analysis

Sesame Chicken With Rice vs Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked)

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sesame Chicken With Rice

Sesame Chicken With Rice

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked)

Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked)

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
310 kcal
Energy
286 kcal
19g
Sugars
17.9g
9g
Fat
1.8g
8g
Protein
46.4g
1.3g
Salt
4.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sesame Chicken With Rice and Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked) side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sesame Chicken With Rice is the more energy-dense option here, packing 24 more calories per 100g than Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked). If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sesame Chicken With Rice contains significantly more sugar (19g) compared to the milder Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked) (17.9g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked) is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sesame Chicken With Rice or Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked)?

It depends on your goals. Sesame Chicken With Rice has 310 calories, while Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked) has 286 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sesame Chicken With Rice vegan?

No, Sesame Chicken With Rice is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sesame Chicken With Rice and Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked)?

There is a difference of 24 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.