Head-to-Head Analysis

Sesame miso salad with salmon vs Bite Size Dippers Tortilla Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sesame miso salad with salmon

Sesame miso salad with salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Bite Size Dippers Tortilla Chips

Bite Size Dippers Tortilla Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
370 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
9g
Sugars
0g
27g
Fat
21.4g
14g
Protein
7.1g
2.3g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sesame miso salad with salmon and Bite Size Dippers Tortilla Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sesame miso salad with salmon is the clear winner. With 130 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sesame miso salad with salmon contains significantly more sugar (9g) compared to the milder Bite Size Dippers Tortilla Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Bite Size Dippers Tortilla Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sesame miso salad with salmon offers a protein boost with 14g per 100g, outperforming Bite Size Dippers Tortilla Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sesame miso salad with salmon or Bite Size Dippers Tortilla Chips?

It depends on your goals. Sesame miso salad with salmon has 370 calories, while Bite Size Dippers Tortilla Chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sesame miso salad with salmon vegan?

No, Sesame miso salad with salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sesame miso salad with salmon and Bite Size Dippers Tortilla Chips?

There is a difference of 130 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.