Head-to-Head Analysis

Shark Friends vs The FROOT Thief

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Shark Friends

Shark Friends

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of The FROOT Thief

The FROOT Thief

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
304 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
52.2g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
4.4g
Protein
0g
0.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Shark Friends and The FROOT Thief side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Shark Friends is the more energy-dense option here, packing 304 more calories per 100g than The FROOT Thief. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Shark Friends contains significantly more sugar (52.2g) compared to the milder The FROOT Thief (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, The FROOT Thief is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Shark Friends offers a protein boost with 4.35g per 100g, outperforming The FROOT Thief in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Shark Friends or The FROOT Thief?

It depends on your goals. Shark Friends has 304 calories, while The FROOT Thief has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Shark Friends vegan?

No, Shark Friends is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Shark Friends and The FROOT Thief?

There is a difference of 304 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.