Shashuska vs Fish steaks
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Shashuska
Fish steaks
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Shashuska and Fish steaks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Shashuska is the more energy-dense option here, packing 122 more calories per 100g than Fish steaks. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Shashuska contains significantly more sugar (4.44g) compared to the milder Fish steaks (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Fish steaks is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Shashuska offers a protein boost with 13.3g per 100g, outperforming Fish steaks in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Shashuska or Fish steaks?
It depends on your goals. Shashuska has 122 calories, while Fish steaks has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Shashuska vegan?
No, Shashuska is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Shashuska and Fish steaks?
There is a difference of 122 calories per 100g between the two products.
