Shasta vs Nesquik
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Shasta
Nesquik
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Shasta and Nesquik side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Shasta is the clear winner. With 385 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Shasta takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Nesquik contains 76.9g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Shasta or Nesquik?
Shasta appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Shasta vegan?
No, Shasta is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Shasta and Nesquik?
There is a difference of 385 calories per 100g between the two products.
