Head-to-Head Analysis

SHIO PAN salted butter roll vs Pamela's, whenever bars, oat chocolate chip coconut

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of SHIO PAN salted butter roll

SHIO PAN salted butter roll

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Pamela's, whenever bars, oat chocolate chip coconut

Pamela's, whenever bars, oat chocolate chip coconut

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
363.6 kcal
Energy
450 kcal
9.1g
Sugars
20g
16.4g
Fat
22.5g
7.3g
Protein
5g
0.8g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing SHIO PAN salted butter roll and Pamela's, whenever bars, oat chocolate chip coconut side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, SHIO PAN salted butter roll is the clear winner. With 86 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, SHIO PAN salted butter roll takes the lead with only 9.09090909090909g of sugar per 100g, whereas Pamela's, whenever bars, oat chocolate chip coconut contains 20g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? SHIO PAN salted butter roll offers a protein boost with 7.27272727272727g per 100g, outperforming Pamela's, whenever bars, oat chocolate chip coconut in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: SHIO PAN salted butter roll or Pamela's, whenever bars, oat chocolate chip coconut?

SHIO PAN salted butter roll appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is SHIO PAN salted butter roll vegan?

No, SHIO PAN salted butter roll is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between SHIO PAN salted butter roll and Pamela's, whenever bars, oat chocolate chip coconut?

There is a difference of 86 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.