Head-to-Head Analysis

Shortline Combo - Chicken Katsu & Salmon Nigiri Pieces vs Orange Cupcakes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Shortline Combo - Chicken Katsu & Salmon Nigiri Pieces

Shortline Combo - Chicken Katsu & Salmon Nigiri Pieces

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Orange Cupcakes

Orange Cupcakes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
365 kcal
6.8g
Sugars
45.8g
6.7g
Fat
12.5g
7.5g
Protein
2.1g
0.9g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Shortline Combo - Chicken Katsu & Salmon Nigiri Pieces and Orange Cupcakes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Shortline Combo - Chicken Katsu & Salmon Nigiri Pieces is the clear winner. With 365 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Shortline Combo - Chicken Katsu & Salmon Nigiri Pieces takes the lead with only 6.8g of sugar per 100g, whereas Orange Cupcakes contains 45.83g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Shortline Combo - Chicken Katsu & Salmon Nigiri Pieces offers a protein boost with 7.48g per 100g, outperforming Orange Cupcakes in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Shortline Combo - Chicken Katsu & Salmon Nigiri Pieces or Orange Cupcakes?

Shortline Combo - Chicken Katsu & Salmon Nigiri Pieces appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Shortline Combo - Chicken Katsu & Salmon Nigiri Pieces vegan?

No, Shortline Combo - Chicken Katsu & Salmon Nigiri Pieces is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Shortline Combo - Chicken Katsu & Salmon Nigiri Pieces and Orange Cupcakes?

There is a difference of 365 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.