Head-to-Head Analysis

Shredded Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese vs Four cheeses asiago fontina parmesan provolone

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Shredded Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Shredded Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Four cheeses asiago fontina parmesan provolone

Four cheeses asiago fontina parmesan provolone

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
17.9g
Fat
30g
28.6g
Protein
20g
1.3g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Shredded Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese and Four cheeses asiago fontina parmesan provolone side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Shredded Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese is the clear winner. With 114 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Shredded Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese offers a protein boost with 28.6g per 100g, outperforming Four cheeses asiago fontina parmesan provolone in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Shredded Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese or Four cheeses asiago fontina parmesan provolone?

It depends on your goals. Shredded Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese has 286 calories, while Four cheeses asiago fontina parmesan provolone has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Shredded Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese vegan?

No, Shredded Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Shredded Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese and Four cheeses asiago fontina parmesan provolone?

There is a difference of 114 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.