Head-to-Head Analysis

Signature Lasagna with Meat & Sauce vs Salted caramel ice cream

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Signature Lasagna with Meat & Sauce

Signature Lasagna with Meat & Sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Salted caramel ice cream

Salted caramel ice cream

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
130 kcal
Energy
225 kcal
2.5g
Sugars
0g
4.6g
Fat
21.2g
8.4g
Protein
2.5g
1.1g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Signature Lasagna with Meat & Sauce and Salted caramel ice cream side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Signature Lasagna with Meat & Sauce is the clear winner. With 95 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Signature Lasagna with Meat & Sauce contains significantly more sugar (2.52g) compared to the milder Salted caramel ice cream (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Salted caramel ice cream is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Signature Lasagna with Meat & Sauce offers a protein boost with 8.4g per 100g, outperforming Salted caramel ice cream in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Signature Lasagna with Meat & Sauce or Salted caramel ice cream?

It depends on your goals. Signature Lasagna with Meat & Sauce has 130 calories, while Salted caramel ice cream has 225 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Signature Lasagna with Meat & Sauce vegan?

No, Signature Lasagna with Meat & Sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Signature Lasagna with Meat & Sauce and Salted caramel ice cream?

There is a difference of 95 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.