Head-to-Head Analysis

Silk Almond Creamer vs CHOCOLATE PLANT-BASED MILK

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Silk Almond Creamer

Silk Almond Creamer

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of CHOCOLATE PLANT-BASED MILK

CHOCOLATE PLANT-BASED MILK

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
166.7 kcal
Energy
58.3 kcal
26.7g
Sugars
6.3g
6.7g
Fat
1.9g
0g
Protein
3.3g
0.3g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Silk Almond Creamer and CHOCOLATE PLANT-BASED MILK side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Silk Almond Creamer is the more energy-dense option here, packing 108 more calories per 100g than CHOCOLATE PLANT-BASED MILK. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Silk Almond Creamer contains significantly more sugar (26.666666666667g) compared to the milder CHOCOLATE PLANT-BASED MILK (6.25g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, CHOCOLATE PLANT-BASED MILK is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Silk Almond Creamer or CHOCOLATE PLANT-BASED MILK?

It depends on your goals. Silk Almond Creamer has 166.66666666667 calories, while CHOCOLATE PLANT-BASED MILK has 58.333333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Silk Almond Creamer vegan?

No, Silk Almond Creamer is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Silk Almond Creamer and CHOCOLATE PLANT-BASED MILK?

There is a difference of 108 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.