Head-to-Head Analysis

Silk Almond Creamer vs Tropical fruit in light syrup & passionfruit juice

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Silk Almond Creamer

Silk Almond Creamer

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tropical fruit in light syrup & passionfruit juice

Tropical fruit in light syrup & passionfruit juice

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
166.7 kcal
Energy
56.9 kcal
26.7g
Sugars
16.3g
6.7g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0.8g
0.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Silk Almond Creamer and Tropical fruit in light syrup & passionfruit juice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Silk Almond Creamer is the more energy-dense option here, packing 110 more calories per 100g than Tropical fruit in light syrup & passionfruit juice. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Silk Almond Creamer contains significantly more sugar (26.666666666667g) compared to the milder Tropical fruit in light syrup & passionfruit juice (16.26g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Tropical fruit in light syrup & passionfruit juice is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Silk Almond Creamer or Tropical fruit in light syrup & passionfruit juice?

It depends on your goals. Silk Almond Creamer has 166.66666666667 calories, while Tropical fruit in light syrup & passionfruit juice has 56.91 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Silk Almond Creamer vegan?

No, Silk Almond Creamer is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Silk Almond Creamer and Tropical fruit in light syrup & passionfruit juice?

There is a difference of 110 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.