Head-to-Head Analysis

Silk Organic Soy Unsweet vs Milk Chocolate Flavor Reduced Calorie Hot Cocoa Mix

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Silk Organic Soy Unsweet

Silk Organic Soy Unsweet

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Milk Chocolate Flavor Reduced Calorie Hot Cocoa Mix

Milk Chocolate Flavor Reduced Calorie Hot Cocoa Mix

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
80 kcal
Energy
364 kcal
0g
Sugars
36.4g
4.5g
Fat
0g
7g
Protein
27.3g
0.2g
Salt
3.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Silk Organic Soy Unsweet and Milk Chocolate Flavor Reduced Calorie Hot Cocoa Mix side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Silk Organic Soy Unsweet is the clear winner. With 284 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Silk Organic Soy Unsweet takes the lead with only 0.00001g of sugar per 100g, whereas Milk Chocolate Flavor Reduced Calorie Hot Cocoa Mix contains 36.4g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Silk Organic Soy Unsweet or Milk Chocolate Flavor Reduced Calorie Hot Cocoa Mix?

Silk Organic Soy Unsweet appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Silk Organic Soy Unsweet vegan?

No, Silk Organic Soy Unsweet is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Silk Organic Soy Unsweet and Milk Chocolate Flavor Reduced Calorie Hot Cocoa Mix?

There is a difference of 284 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.