Head-to-Head Analysis

Silky smooth promises dark chocolate & sea salt caramel bar vs Swiss Rolls

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Silky smooth promises dark chocolate & sea salt caramel bar

Silky smooth promises dark chocolate & sea salt caramel bar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Swiss Rolls

Swiss Rolls

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
444 kcal
46.9g
Sugars
44.4g
28.1g
Fat
19g
3.1g
Protein
1.6g
0.2g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Silky smooth promises dark chocolate & sea salt caramel bar and Swiss Rolls side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Silky smooth promises dark chocolate & sea salt caramel bar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 56 more calories per 100g than Swiss Rolls. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Silky smooth promises dark chocolate & sea salt caramel bar contains significantly more sugar (46.875g) compared to the milder Swiss Rolls (44.4g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Swiss Rolls is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Silky smooth promises dark chocolate & sea salt caramel bar or Swiss Rolls?

It depends on your goals. Silky smooth promises dark chocolate & sea salt caramel bar has 500 calories, while Swiss Rolls has 444 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Silky smooth promises dark chocolate & sea salt caramel bar vegan?

No, Silky smooth promises dark chocolate & sea salt caramel bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Silky smooth promises dark chocolate & sea salt caramel bar and Swiss Rolls?

There is a difference of 56 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.