Head-to-Head Analysis

Simple Mills, Sweet Thins Chocolate Brownie vs Oat Milk + Salted Almond 55% Dark Chocolate (Bumble Bee)

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Simple Mills, Sweet Thins Chocolate Brownie

Simple Mills, Sweet Thins Chocolate Brownie

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Oat Milk + Salted Almond 55% Dark Chocolate (Bumble Bee)

Oat Milk + Salted Almond 55% Dark Chocolate (Bumble Bee)

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
467 kcal
Energy
534.9 kcal
20g
Sugars
27.9g
20g
Fat
39.5g
6.7g
Protein
7g
0.8g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Simple Mills, Sweet Thins Chocolate Brownie and Oat Milk + Salted Almond 55% Dark Chocolate (Bumble Bee) side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Simple Mills, Sweet Thins Chocolate Brownie is the clear winner. With 68 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Simple Mills, Sweet Thins Chocolate Brownie takes the lead with only 20g of sugar per 100g, whereas Oat Milk + Salted Almond 55% Dark Chocolate (Bumble Bee) contains 27.906976744186g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Simple Mills, Sweet Thins Chocolate Brownie or Oat Milk + Salted Almond 55% Dark Chocolate (Bumble Bee)?

Simple Mills, Sweet Thins Chocolate Brownie appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Simple Mills, Sweet Thins Chocolate Brownie vegan?

No, Simple Mills, Sweet Thins Chocolate Brownie is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Simple Mills, Sweet Thins Chocolate Brownie and Oat Milk + Salted Almond 55% Dark Chocolate (Bumble Bee)?

There is a difference of 68 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.